Wyeth/Pfizer Merger – Will Justice Roberts Recuse from Wyeth v. Levine for Pfizer Stock?

Camryn Hansen
Contributor
Posted by Camryn HansenFebruary 28, 2009 11:43 PM

Last November, the US Supreme Court heard arguments for Wyeth v. Levine, a crucial preemption case which will decide whether federal law preempts a state law tort action challenging the FDA labeling of the Wyeth drug Phenergan, known to cause gangrene when improperly administered. The Court’s decision, while presumably made in private only days later, has yet to officially materialize.

But wait! Wyeth is about to be acquired by uncle drug giant Pfizer.

On Feb. 4, Wyeth's lawyer before the Court, Seth Waxman of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr sent a letter to the clerk of the Supreme Court informing the Court of the pending transaction. But Waxman told the Court that because of pending stockholder approvals and other matters, the transaction will not be completed until July 31 at the earliest—weeks after the end of the Court term, by which time its decision would have been released. As a result, Waxman said he does not believe the pending takeover “warrants amendment of the corporate disclosure statement” submitted by Wyeth when Wyeth petitioned the Court last year. That disclosure statement is ordinarily the way justices are informed about parent companies and subidiaries that lets them know if recusal is required. –Tony Mauro, Legal Times.

Because Chief Justice John Roberts owns Pfizer stock, he usually recuses himself in any case involving Pfizer. The outcome of Levine will likely affect the value of Wyeth, and in turn, the value of Pfizer. And yet, Roberts heard arguments in Wyeth v. Levine before talk of a Pfizer merger had even begun. Will he recuse, potentially creating a 4-4 split on a case that may very well have gone 5-4 to the drug companies? Or will he rule in favor of Wyeth—and accordingly, Pfizer—in so doing knowingly strengthening the future of his own stock?

To read more about Wyeth, Pfizer, and Wyeth v. Levine, see The Ferrara Law Firm’s Cherry Hill blog.

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Mike Bryant
Posted by Mike Bryant
March 01, 2009 1:12 AM

Interesting question, but with all of the conflicts that there have been up there, it makes you wonder.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Cherry Hill

InjuryBoard Cherry Hill RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Cherry Hill is brought to you by Ferrara Law Firm

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Ferrara Law Firm (866) 735-1102 Ext 650 www.ferraralawfirm.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Bellmawr, Berlin, Blackwood, Burlington City, Burlington County, Camden, Camden County, Cherry Hill, Clayton, Collingswood, Cumberland County, Deptford, Glassboro, Gloucester City, Gloucester County, Haddonfield, Lawnside, Lindenwold, Maple Shade, Marlton, Medford, Mt. Holly, Mt. Laurel, Pennsauken, Pennsgrove, Philadelphia, Pine Hill, Salem County, Shamong, Sicklerville, Southhampton, Turnersville, Voorhees, Washington Township, Williamstown, Willingboro, Winslow Township, Woodbury
601 Longwood Avenue, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address